Discussion

[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]


Re: Semtek and Hart v. AA

From:
Date: 09 May 2002
Time: 20:42:37

Comments

Yes, he could have followed the accepted reading of Rule 41(b), as set forth in Rinehart and Costello, to the effect that 41(b) did not cover dismissals on SOL grounds.


Last changed: May 09, 2002
Return to home page