[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: KMC
Date: 09 May 2002
Time: 18:44:30
The words of 1367(b) do not reach the joinder of plaintiffs under Rule 20, as opposed to the joinder of defendants.
And when the Circuits are split 4-3 on this point, I don't see how we can be dogmatic.